woensdag 9 december 2009

Amerika`s mening over Jerusalem.

Uiteindelijk heeft ook Amerika zich gemengd in de Europese bemoeienissen met Jerusalem.
Amerika heeft verklaard dat de status van Jerusalem alleen door onderhandelingen tussen Israel en de Palestijnen geregeld kan worden.
Toch heeft Amerika hier ook boter op het hoofd.
Nog niet zo lang geleden sprak het zich uit voor een complete bouwstop door Israel en Oost-Jerusalem
Door die uitspraak gaf het een verkeerd signaal af. Waarom zou Israel moeten stoppen als nog niet bepaald is hoe de status uit zal vallen en Israel Jerusalem als verenigd beschouwt?
Amerika draait momenteel van links naar rechts en omgekeerd, waarbij links en rechts geen politieke kleur is.
Ooit gaf Clinton in 2001 schriftelijk bevestiging dat Jerusalem apart moest worden gezien van de West Bank, maar Obama heeft het daar nu moeilijk mee. Ook Hillary zwaait een beetje mee. Maar nu heeft Amerika in ieder geval een verstandige uitspraak gedaan.
Het is een beetje dom van Europa om zo hard achter Zweden aan te lopen.
Zweden is momenteel berucht om zijn aperte anti-Israel houding, wat onlangs tot uiting kwam.
Een Israelische tennister kon in Zweden niet eens normaal deelnemen aan wedstrijden.
Een jouwende menigte bedreigde haar. Dit was zelfs zo ernstig, dat de internationale tennisbond Zweden een straf oplegde.
Dit zelfde Zweden wilde nu zijn voorzitterschap van de Europese Unie afsluiten met een gezichtsbepalende resolutie.
En wat lag meer voor de hand om gebeten hond Israel als slachtoffer te kiezen!
Het is bedroevend dat de EU daar in is getrapt, maar de opzet is niet gelukt.
Volgende maand treedt er gelukkig een nieuwe voorzitter aan.
U.S.: Only Israel, Palestinians should decide Jerusalem's future
By Natasha Mozgovaya and Barak Ravid, Haaretz Correspondents and Haaretz Service

Shortly after European Union Ministers announced their support for the division of Jerusalem between Israel and a future Palestinian state on Tuesday, the U.S. State Department issued a statement saying that the fate of Jerusalem should only be determined by Israel and the Palestinians in talks.

"Our position on Jerusalem is clear. United States policy remains unaffected and unchanged: As has been stated by every previous administration which addressed this issue, the status of Jerusalem, and all other permanent status issues, must be resolved by the parties through negotiations," the statement read.

The status of Jerusalem - a city holy to three religions - is a sensitive issue for Israel, which considers the city to be its indivisible capital. Palestinians want the eastern part of Jerusalem to serve as the capital of a Palestinian state.

Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, meanwhile, said on Wednesday that Sweden failed in a bid to bring about a harsher EU statement.

"We think that common sense won out, and it was clear that between the draft, which was floated by the Swedes, and the final document there is no connection whatsoever," Lieberman told Israel Radio. He was referring to the EU draft document on the division of Jerusalem.

On Tuesday, the EU foreign ministers reiterated in Brussels that the 27-member bloc would not recognize Israel's annexation of the eastern part of Jerusalem after the 1967 Six Day War.

Lieberman told Israel Radio that Sweden, which holds the EU rotating presidency, had tried to push the ministers further on the matter, in an attempt to leave behind a legacy.

"It appears that the Swedes tried to do here something that is called 'stealing' the vote, or 'grabbing' the vote, before they finish their presidency," he said.

"People have a certain inclination to leave behind them a type of 'impact,' or influence after they end a certain position. The Swedes are finishing their presidency without any sort of significant perceived 'effect'? As such, toward the end they tried to make a dramatic change."

Jordanian Foreign Minister Nasser Judeh, however, welcomed the EU foreign ministers' statement as an "extremely important attitude."

"The EU ministerial council's decision on the Middle East and Jerusalem in particular implies a landmark and extremely important attitude," Judeh told the state-run television.

Last week, Sweden presented a draft document supporting the division of Jerusalem and the recognition of East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state.

Click here for the EU draft document on the division of Jerusalem.

Earlier Tuesday, Foreign Ministry officials responded with harsh criticism to the European declaration, saying that Sweden, which holds the EU's rotating presidency, had failed.

"The peace process in the Middle East is not like IKEA furniture," one official said, making a reference to the do-it-yourself Swedish furniture chain. "It takes more than a screw and a hammer, it takes a true understanding of the constraints and sensitivities of both sides, and in that Sweden failed miserably."

The Foreign Ministry said that Tuesday's EU statement was substantially softer than Sweden's initial draft, once again demonstrating Sweden's failure as the rotating president of the union. "Sweden has done nothing over recent months to advance the Middle East peace process," the Foreign Ministry officials said. "The EU's only saving grace is that some of its members are responsible and moderate nations that didn't support the Swedish draft, which looked like something taken out of the Fatah platform at the Bethlehem conference."

The senior officials added that a group of nations had "saved the European Union from itself, since any other decision would have dealt severe harm to the relations between Jerusalem and Brussels, and would have prevented the EU from becoming an important partner in the peace process."

Meanwhile, the Foreign Ministry issued an official response to the EU statement, saying that the "European Union ignores the primary obstacle to achieving a resolution between Israel and the Palestinians: the Palestinian refusal to return to the negotiating table."

"Given the Israeli government's efforts to renew the negotiations, Israel regrets that the EU has chosen to adopt a text that, although containing nothing new, does not contribute to the renewal of negotiations," the statement continued.

"In light of the extreme draft originally presented by the Swedish presidency at the start of discussions, Israel does welcome the fact that at the end of the process the voices of the responsible and reasonable EU states prevailed, balancing and improving the text. We also welcome the recognition given to the measures and efforts taken by Israel to enable the resumption of negotiations," it went on to say.

"We expect the EU to act to promote direct negotiations between the parties, while considering Israel's security needs and understanding that Israel's Jewish character must be preserved in any future agreement," concluded the statement.

Meanwhile, Jerusalem Mayor Nir Barkat also issued a statement, saying that he "completely rejects the decision of the EU to support the division of Jerusalem," calling it a real danger for the future of Jerusalem and predicting that such a division would never work. Barkat noted that the recent celebration of the 20th anniversary of the reunification of Berlin reminds us that "no divided city in the history of the world has functioned properly."

Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie posten