maandag 19 april 2010

Petitie: Amnesty International onder vuur wegens associatie met islamist


Meer zorgwekkend nieuws over Amnesty International.
 
 
RP
-------------
 
 
 
Please read this, and sign the petition to support Human Rights  and Gita Sahgal.
 
Gita Sahgal resigned her senior position at Amnesty International following her suspension. Sahgal is a veteran campaigner for gender rights and member of Women Against Fundamentalism. She was suspended for criticizing Amnesty's connection with Moazzam Begg, a supporter of Islamism and ex-Guantanamo inmate, and his organization Cageprisoners. In February she had written:
 

This morning the Sunday Times published an article about Amnesty International's association with groups that support the Taliban and promote Islamic Right ideas. In that article, I was quoted as raising concerns about Amnesty's very high profile associations with Guantanamo-detainee Moazzam Begg. I felt that Amnesty International was risking its reputation by associating itself with Begg, who heads an organization, Cageprisoners, that actively promotes Islamic Right ideas and individuals. 

Within a few hours of the article being published, Amnesty had suspended me from my job.

A moment comes, which comes but rarely in history, when a great organisation must ask: if it lies to itself, can it demand the truth of others? For in defending the torture standard, one of the strongest and most embedded in international human rights law, Amnesty International has sanitized the history and politics of the ex-Guantanamo detainee, Moazzam Begg and completely failed to recognize the nature of his organisation Cageprisoners. 

The tragedy here is that the necessary defence of the torture standard has been inexcusably allied to the political legitimization of individuals and organisations belonging to the Islamic Right. 

I have always opposed the illegal detention and torture of Muslim men at Guantanamo Bay and during the so-called War on Terror. I have been horrified and appalled by the treatment of people like Moazzam Begg and I have personally told him so. I have vocally opposed attempts by governments to justify 'torture lite'.

The issue is not about Moazzam Begg's freedom of opinion, nor about his right to propound his views: he already exercises these rights fully as he should. The issue is a fundamental one about the importance of the human rights movement maintaining an objective distance from groups and ideas that are committed to systematic discrimination and fundamentally undermine the universality of human rights. I have raised this issue because of my firm belief in human rights for all.

I sent two memos to my management asking a series of questions about what considerations were given to the nature of the relationship with Moazzam Begg and his organisation, Cageprisoners. I have received no answer to my questions. There has been a history of warnings within Amnesty that it is inadvisable to partner with Begg. Amnesty has created the impression that Begg is not only a victim of human rights violations but a defender of human rights. Many of my highly respected colleagues, each well-regarded in their area of expertise has said so. Each has been set aside.

As a result of my speaking to the Sunday Times, Amnesty International has announced that it has launched an internal inquiry. This is the moment to press for public answers, and to demonstrate that there is already a public demand including from Amnesty International members, to restore the integrity of the organisation and remind it of its fundamental principles.

I have been a human rights campaigner for over three decades, defending the rights of women and ethnic minorities, defending religious freedom and the rights of victims of torture, and campaigning against illegal detention and state repression. I have raised the issue of the association of Amnesty International with groups such as Begg's consistently within the organisation. I have now been suspended for trying to do my job and staying faithful to Amnesty's mission to protect and defend human rights universally and impartially.

 
Amnesty has also blatantly taken sides in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, a matter of political position and not "rights," as it sponsored an event called "Capital Murder" about Israel's building in East Jerusalem, with a speaker who wrote the obligatory book on "Israel Apartheid." Amnesty has obviously been coopted from being a "rights" organization into being a "wrongs" organization.
 
(A.I.)
 
 

Geen opmerkingen:

Een reactie plaatsen